Re: [BUGS] [HACKERS] split_part bug

2004-11-20 Thread John Hansen
> [ shrug... ] Works fine for me in unicode, too. never mind me,. I broke it. seems my assumption that UCS2 == UTF16 was way off ... john ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate

Re: [BUGS] [HACKERS] split_part bug

2004-11-20 Thread John Hansen
> Works fine for me. What encoding/locale are you using? unicode / c ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

Re: [BUGS] [HACKERS] split_part bug

2004-11-17 Thread Tom Lane
John Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Works fine for me. What encoding/locale are you using? > unicode / c [ shrug... ] Works fine for me in unicode, too. u=# select split_part('a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z',' ',1); split_part a (1 row) u=# select s

Re: [BUGS] [HACKERS] split_part bug

2004-11-17 Thread Tom Lane
John Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > PostgreSQL 8.0b4 as released. > select split_part('a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y > z',' ',1); > select split_part('a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y > z',' ',2); > select split_part('a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s