Re: [BUGS] [GENERAL] [ADMIN] Misplaced modifier in Postgresql license

2003-11-29 Thread Richard Welty
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 17:23:56 -0500 (EST) Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Richard Welty wrote: > > but you can consult with the attorneys for the Regents. they have > > changed the license at times, and have passed those changes on > > to other BSD licensed projects (e.g., when they remo

Re: [BUGS] [GENERAL] [ADMIN] Misplaced modifier in Postgresql license

2003-11-29 Thread Richard Welty
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 17:58:19 -0500 (EST) Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, where did you get this wording? Is this something Berkeley released > as one of their versions of the BSD license. yes, i believe that it originally came from the Berkeley lawyers. richard -- Richard Welty

Re: [BUGS] [GENERAL] [ADMIN] Misplaced modifier in Postgresql license

2003-11-29 Thread Richard Welty
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 09:01:39 +1100 Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't that also require permission from > every other contributer to PostgreSQL ever? I mean, hypothetically there > might be someone in there who disagrees with the change. i don

Re: [BUGS] [GENERAL] [ADMIN] Misplaced modifier in Postgresql license

2003-11-29 Thread Richard Welty
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 13:50:23 -0500 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Breen Ouellette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The result of this ambiguity is that the > > latest CD release of OpenBSD (3.4) no longer includes Postgresql > We are not changing the license text we inherited from Berkeley.

Re: [BUGS] [GENERAL] [ADMIN] Misplaced modifier in Postgresql license

2003-11-29 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 04:50:40PM -0500, Richard Welty wrote: > On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 13:50:23 -0500 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Breen Ouellette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The result of this ambiguity is that the > > > latest CD release of OpenBSD (3.4) no longer includes Postgres

Re: [BUGS] [GENERAL] [ADMIN] Misplaced modifier in Postgresql license

2003-11-28 Thread Bruce Momjian
Richard Welty wrote: > On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 17:58:19 -0500 (EST) Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > OK, where did you get this wording? Is this something Berkeley released > > as one of their versions of the BSD license. > > yes, i believe that it originally came from the Berkeley lawyer

Re: [BUGS] [GENERAL] [ADMIN] Misplaced modifier in Postgresql license

2003-11-28 Thread Bruce Momjian
Richard Welty wrote: > On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 17:23:56 -0500 (EST) Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Richard Welty wrote: > > > but you can consult with the attorneys for the Regents. they have > > > changed the license at times, and have passed those changes on > > > to other BSD licens

Re: [BUGS] [GENERAL] [ADMIN] Misplaced modifier in Postgresql license

2003-11-28 Thread Bruce Momjian
Richard Welty wrote: > but you can consult with the attorneys for the Regents. they have > changed the license at times, and have passed those changes on > to other BSD licensed projects (e.g., when they removed the > advertising clause the advertising clause was also removed from > all the code in