On 27 May 2013 15:31, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs writes:
>> On 26 May 2013 17:10, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> More readable would be to invent an intermediate nonterminal falling
>>> between ColId and ColLabel, whose expansion would be "IDENT |
>>> unreserved_keyword | col_name_keyword | type_func_na
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs writes:
>> On 26 May 2013 17:10, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> More readable would be to invent an intermediate nonterminal falling
>>> between ColId and ColLabel, whose expansion would be "IDENT |
>>> unreserved_keyword | col_name_keyword |
Simon Riggs writes:
> On 26 May 2013 17:10, Tom Lane wrote:
>> More readable would be to invent an intermediate nonterminal falling
>> between ColId and ColLabel, whose expansion would be "IDENT |
>> unreserved_keyword | col_name_keyword | type_func_name_keyword", and
>> then replace ColId_or_Sco
On 26 May 2013 17:10, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas writes:
> More readable would be to invent an intermediate nonterminal falling
> between ColId and ColLabel, whose expansion would be "IDENT |
> unreserved_keyword | col_name_keyword | type_func_name_keyword", and
> then replace ColId_or
Heikki Linnakangas writes:
> On 26.05.2013 04:31, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> This new format does not [work:]
>> COPY pgbench_accounts FROM '/tmp/acc' (FORMAT BINARY);
>> ERROR: syntax error at or near "BINARY" at character 47
> This seems to work:
> --- a/src/backend/parser/gram.y
> +++ b/src/backe