On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 04:51:04PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > Would someone make the doc change outlined above? Thanks.
>
> Sorry, I'd nearly forgotten about this issue. Will see about fixing the
> docs. (It looks like some of the comments in execMain.c could use work
>
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Would someone make the doc change outlined above? Thanks.
Sorry, I'd nearly forgotten about this issue. Will see about fixing the
docs. (It looks like some of the comments in execMain.c could use work
too.)
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql
: Tom Lane
> Cc: Robert Haas; Hitoshi Harada; pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org;
> pgsql-hack...@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #6572: The example of SPI_execute is bogus
>
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 12:29:39PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Robert Haas writes:
> >
...@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #6572: The example of SPI_execute is bogus
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 12:29:39PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
> > On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 2:39 AM, Hitoshi Harada wrote:
> >> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
&g
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 12:29:39PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
> > On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 2:39 AM, Hitoshi Harada wrote:
> >> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> Given the lack of complaints since 9.0, maybe we should not fix this
> >>> but just redefine the ne
