"David M. Kaplan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have found that !~ and !~* do not match the null string even when one
> would expect them to.
NULL strings won't match anything. I can't tell whether your row 3 is
an empty string or a NULL --- but if it's a NULL, this behavior is
not a bug. Tr
On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, David M. Kaplan wrote:
> I have found that !~ and !~* do not match the null string even when one
> would expect them to. I am not sure if this is how it is supposed to
> work or if this is an error. If this is how it works, I can't figure
> out where it is states in the doc
I have found that !~ and !~* do not match the null string even when one
would expect them to. I am not sure if this is how it is supposed to
work or if this is an error. If this is how it works, I can't figure
out where it is states in the documentation.
Let me give an example. Suppose we h
