John R Pierce wrote:
chris wood wrote:
At a detailed level (which is NOT the direction I want this thread to
go) I do not agree with your statement that my proposal has no “hope
of ACID compliance or transactional integrity”. When the “slices” are
stored back to the cloud, this is the equivale
chris wood wrote:
At a detailed level (which is NOT the direction I want this thread to
go) I do not agree with your statement that my proposal has no “hope
of ACID compliance or transactional integrity”. When the “slices” are
stored back to the cloud, this is the equivalent of a commit and the
> yet you propose dumbing down the database even farther, without any hope
of ACID
> compliance, without any transactional integrity, indeed, without even
really being
> relational ?
> at least, thats what I get from my first read of it.
OK so you are a theorist/perfectionist, I can respect
