gards,
>
> Daniel
>
> -Ursprungliche Nachricht-
> Von: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 1. Juli 2003 15:44
> An: Curt Sampson
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: Re: [BUGS] pg_dump -t option doesn't take schema-qualified
> table n
option doesn't take schema-qualified
table names
Curt Sampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It appears that the command "pgsql -t foo.bar" will not dump the table
> bar in the schema foo. I saw a patch a while back to add schema support
> to pg_dump (with the --na
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> Curt Sampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It appears that the command "pgsql -t foo.bar" will not dump the table
> > bar in the schema foo. I saw a patch a while back to add schema support
> > to pg_dump (with the --namespace option), but I did not see a fi
Curt Sampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
>> IMO that's not a bug; you should spell it pg_dump -n foo -t bar.
>> The other way is ambiguous with a table named "foo.bar".
> Oh, I didn't realize that dots are allowed in table names. But is there
> an unambiguous
Curt Sampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It appears that the command "pgsql -t foo.bar" will not dump the table
> bar in the schema foo. I saw a patch a while back to add schema support
> to pg_dump (with the --namespace option), but I did not see a fix for
> this.
IMO that's not a bug; you shou
It appears that the command "pgsql -t foo.bar" will not dump the table
bar in the schema foo. I saw a patch a while back to add schema support
to pg_dump (with the --namespace option), but I did not see a fix for
this.
cjs
--
Curt Sampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netb
