On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 02:17:23PM -0800, Theodore Petrosky wrote:
> and to my suprise, i was in and able to issue
> commands. what is 'bothering' me is that I was not
> asked for a password. in defence of the system, I was
> on a mac os x box logged in as 'postgres' so my
> current name was postg
On Tuesday 09 March 2004 22:17, Theodore Petrosky wrote:
> recently I was playing around with psql and tried to
> log onto a postgresql server so I tried...
>
> psql -h 10.0.1.233 dbname
> is this correct behaviour? I was expecting to be
> challenged.
Host-based access is controlled via the pg_hb
Theodore Petrosky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> recently I was playing around with psql and tried to
> log onto a postgresql server so I tried...
> psql -h 10.0.1.233 dbname
> and to my suprise, i was in and able to issue
> commands. what is 'bothering' me is that I was not
> asked for a password
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 07:33:31PM -0500, Alex J. Avriette wrote:
> the postgres distribution. Additionally, this really isn't a question
> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Meep, my apologies, this wasn't sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alex J. Avriette, Solaris Systems Masseur
"I ... remain
recently I was playing around with psql and tried to
log onto a postgresql server so I tried...
psql -h 10.0.1.233 dbname
and to my suprise, i was in and able to issue
commands. what is 'bothering' me is that I was not
asked for a password. in defence of the system, I was
on a mac os x box logged
