Hi there,
I try to compile postgres on an IBM RS/6000 44P Model 170 with
AIX Version 4.3
And it works. But when I try to create the TclTk (I need only the
Libraies for tcl) then I got an Error
...
ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .Tcl_Eval
ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .Tcl_GetStri
Hi Bruce,
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I have a patch here that handles all the TCL/UTF issues.
> Would you let me know if it is OK?
I think, it isn't really a clean fix. It only works, if your
database's encoding and Tcl's system encoding are identical. If the
database uses a dif
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Reinhard Max <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >> Do you have any idea how this will work with earlier TCL versions?
> >
> > > It won't. If pgtcl is supposed to still be able to compile with older
> > > ver
On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 08:10:32PM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> Hum. Why don't you enable --enable-multibyte and
> --enable-unicode-conversion and set client_encoding to UNICODE? That
> would do a conversion from/to UTF-8 for Tcl 8.x (x > 9) clients?
You're right. Probably, this way correct enoug
Hum. Why don't you enable --enable-multibyte and
--enable-unicode-conversion and set client_encoding to UNICODE? That
would do a conversion from/to UTF-8 for Tcl 8.x (x > 9) clients?
--
Tatsuo Ishii
> Eugene Faukin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 2
> The lower the number the
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 02:53:22PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > It won't. If pgtcl is supposed to still be able to compile with older
> > versions of Tcl, the changes have to be made a compile time option.
>
> Please do that and resubmit the patch. We really don't want to give up
> backwards com
> > On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > > Reinhard Max <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > >> Do you have any idea how this will work with earlier TCL versions?
> > >
> > > > It won't. If pgtcl is supposed to still be able to compile with o
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Reinhard Max writes:
>
> > OK, I'll pack the new stuff inside #ifdef TCL_UTF8 and define that if
> > the Tcl version is 8.1 or greater.
>
> No, please add a configure check for Tcl_UtfToExternalDString or
> some other function representative of this
> On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> > Reinhard Max writes:
> >
> > > OK, I'll pack the new stuff inside #ifdef TCL_UTF8 and define that if
> > > the Tcl version is 8.1 or greater.
> >
> > No, please add a configure check for Tcl_UtfToExternalDString or
> > some other function repre
Reinhard Max writes:
> OK, I'll pack the new stuff inside #ifdef TCL_UTF8 and define that if
> the Tcl version is 8.1 or greater.
No, please add a configure check for Tcl_UtfToExternalDString or some
other function representative of this interface..
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ht
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Reinhard Max <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >> Do you have any idea how this will work with earlier TCL versions?
> >
> > > It won't. If pgtcl is supposed to still be able to compile with older
> > > ver
On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> Reinhard Max <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> Do you have any idea how this will work with earlier TCL versions?
>
> > It won't. If pgtcl is supposed to still be able to compile with older
> > versions of Tcl, th
On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> Reinhard Max <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> Do you have any idea how this will work with earlier TCL versions?
>
> > It won't. If pgtcl is supposed to still be able to compile with older
> > versions of Tcl, th
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 02:53:22PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > > It won't. If pgtcl is supposed to still be able to compile with older
> > > versions of Tcl, the changes have to be made a compile time option.
> >
> > Please do that and resubmit the patch. We really don't want to give up
> >
Reinhard Max <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Do you have any idea how this will work with earlier TCL versions?
> It won't. If pgtcl is supposed to still be able to compile with older
> versions of Tcl, the changes have to be made a compile time option.
On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Do you have any idea how this will work with earlier TCL versions?
It won't. If pgtcl is supposed to still be able to compile with older
versions of Tcl, the changes have to be made a compile time option.
> When was Tcl_UtfToExternalDString added to T
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Do you have any idea how this will work with earlier TCL versions?
>
> It won't. If pgtcl is supposed to still be able to compile with older
> versions of Tcl, the changes have to be made a compile time option.
Can't we probe the TCL version in
Do you have any idea how this will work with earlier TCL versions? When
was Tcl_UtfToExternalDString added to TCL?
> Eugene Faukin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 2
> The lower the number the more severe it is.
>
> Short Description
> libpgtcl doesn't use UTF encoding of T
Eugene Faukin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 2
The lower the number the more severe it is.
Short Description
libpgtcl doesn't use UTF encoding of TCL
Long Description
Modern versions of the TCL (8.2 at least) use UTF encoding to internal
storage of the text. libpgtcl uses T
Backed out.
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> I just looked at this yesterday and I wonder why one would want to do
> this. The libpgtcl build works perfectly fine and it doesn't even link
> with tcl, so there's little reason to "integrate the tcl-spec" into
> things. The only t
I will back it out then.
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I am happy to back it out. Comments? [Let me give the author time to
> > respond.]
>
> >> I just looked at this yesterday and I wonder why one would want to do
> >> this. The libpgtcl build works perfectly fine and it doe
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am happy to back it out. Comments? [Let me give the author time to
> respond.]
>> I just looked at this yesterday and I wonder why one would want to do
>> this. The libpgtcl build works perfectly fine and it doesn't even link
>> with tcl, so there's
I am happy to back it out. Comments? [Let me give the author time to
respond.]
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> I just looked at this yesterday and I wonder why one would want to do
> this. The libpgtcl build works perfectly fine and it doesn't even link
> with tcl, so there
Applied.
> Hello,
>
> in the Directory src/bin/pgtclsh there is a good mechanism to integrate
> the
> tcl-spec in the Makefile.
> The patch in the attachemant does this in the src/interfaces/libpgtcl
> too
>
> Thank you
> Rudolf
> --
> -
Hello,
in the Directory src/bin/pgtclsh there is a good mechanism to integrate
the
tcl-spec in the Makefile.
The patch in the attachemant does this in the src/interfaces/libpgtcl
too
Thank you
Rudolf
--
---
Rudolf Weber
http://www.infn
25 matches
Mail list logo
