Ian Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just thought that whilst this part of the backend is still fresh in
> your mind you might consider implementing lo_truncate (the lo_ analog
> of the unix truncate system call.)
I'll leave that for someone else (Denis Perchine seems to be
interested). Bug
> Thank you for the carefully developed test case. The bug is actually
> in the backend, not in libpq: ... snip ...
>
> I believe the attached patch fixes these problems, but I haven't been
> able to wring it out very thoroughly because I don't have applications
> that do random seeks and writes
Ian Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm using V 7.0 on a Linux machine and I believe I have found a bug in the
> large object interface provided by libpq.
Thank you for the carefully developed test case. The bug is actually
in the backend, not in libpq: there's an ancient hack in inv_write
