Tom Lane writes:
> Seems to me it makes more sense to check $PGDATA, not one individual
> file within the directory. Ultimately we depend on $PGDATA to have
> the right permissions.
Check moved.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
Tom Lane writes:
> A look at the source code shows it wants 744 or less.
>
> This is probably overly restrictive; in fact, I would argue that there
> should be no such check at all. We do not do runtime checks for
> permissions on any other files, and some of them are far more sensitive
> than p
