Re: [BUGS] collation problem on 9.1-beta1

2011-06-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > On tor, 2011-06-09 at 13:30 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> Column numbers in ORDER BY is ANSI syntax so I don't think calling > >> them "legacy" is accurate. ?"limited functionality"? > > > > It was in SQL 92, but r

Re: [BUGS] collation problem on 9.1-beta1

2011-06-09 Thread Robert Haas
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On tor, 2011-06-09 at 13:30 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> Column numbers in ORDER BY is ANSI syntax so I don't think calling >> them "legacy" is accurate.  "limited functionality"? > > It was in SQL 92, but removed in 99, so it's technical

Re: [BUGS] collation problem on 9.1-beta1

2011-06-09 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On tor, 2011-06-09 at 13:30 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Column numbers in ORDER BY is ANSI syntax so I don't think calling > them "legacy" is accurate. "limited functionality"? It was in SQL 92, but removed in 99, so it's technically no longer part of the standard. -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mai

Re: [BUGS] collation problem on 9.1-beta1

2011-06-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On ons, 2011-05-11 at 14:58 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Marc Cousin writes: > > > I've been starting to work on a 'what's new in 9.1' like i did last > > > year, and am faced with what I feel is a bug, while building a demo case > > > for collation. > > > > > Here it is:

Re: [BUGS] collation problem on 9.1-beta1

2011-06-02 Thread Marc Cousin
On 02/06/2011 14:09, Peter Eisentraut wrote: On ons, 2011-05-11 at 14:58 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: Marc Cousin writes: I've been starting to work on a 'what's new in 9.1' like i did last year, and am faced with what I feel is a bug, while building a demo case for collation. Here it is: SELE

Re: [BUGS] collation problem on 9.1-beta1

2011-06-02 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On ons, 2011-05-11 at 14:58 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Marc Cousin writes: > > I've been starting to work on a 'what's new in 9.1' like i did last > > year, and am faced with what I feel is a bug, while building a demo case > > for collation. > > > Here it is: > > > SELECT * from (values ('llegar'

Re: [BUGS] collation problem on 9.1-beta1

2011-05-11 Thread Tom Lane
Marc Cousin writes: > I've been starting to work on a 'what's new in 9.1' like i did last > year, and am faced with what I feel is a bug, while building a demo case > for collation. > Here it is: > SELECT * from (values ('llegar'),('llorer'),('lugar')) as tmp > order by 1 collate "es_ES.utf8";

[BUGS] collation problem on 9.1-beta1

2011-05-11 Thread Marc Cousin
Hi, I've been starting to work on a 'what's new in 9.1' like i did last year, and am faced with what I feel is a bug, while building a demo case for collation. Here it is: SELECT * from (values ('llegar'),('llorer'),('lugar')) as tmp order by 1 collate "es_ES.utf8"; ERROR: collations are not s