Re: [BUGS] Solution for bug #899

2003-03-27 Thread Bruce Momjian
>Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Patch applied. Thanks. > > Did you do anything to address my complaints about this patch? Yes. It is a new version of the patch, with comments in each section. I am attaching the patch --- any other changes? -- Bruce Momjian

Re: [BUGS] Solution for bug #899

2003-03-27 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Patch applied. Thanks. Did you do anything to address my complaints about this patch? regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the

Re: [BUGS] Solution for bug #899

2003-03-27 Thread Bruce Momjian
Patch applied. Thanks. --- Laurent FAILLIE wrote: > Hello Bruce, > > there is a contextual diff of my patch w/ the current > (I hope) snapshot of postgresql. > > I test it on my own database, but I found another bug > w/

Re: [BUGS] Solution for bug #899

2003-03-25 Thread Bruce Momjian
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours. --- Laurent FAILLIE wrote: > Hello Bruce, >

Re: [BUGS] Solution for bug #899

2003-03-25 Thread Laurent FAILLIE
Hello Bruce, there is a contextual diff of my patch w/ the current (I hope) snapshot of postgresql. I test it on my own database, but I found another bug w/ SEQUENCE this time. I have created a new ticket, #918 for this as it's totaly a separate problem. Bye Laurent -- *** pg_dump.c.org

Re: [BUGS] Solution for bug #899

2003-03-20 Thread Bruce Momjian
This patch can't be applied to CVS. The pg_dump code has changed too much since 7.3.X. Would you supply a new patch for this? Thanks. You can grab the current CVS or a snapshot from our ftp server. Also, would you add a comment of how you are manipulating the ACL tags, and its purpose. Than

Re: [BUGS] Solution for bug #899

2003-03-18 Thread Laurent FAILLIE
--- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > > Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL > unapplied patches list at: > > http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches > > I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours. Ok, thanks a lot. Have a nice day. Laurent = The m

Re: [BUGS] Solution for bug #899

2003-03-17 Thread Bruce Momjian
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours. --- Laurent FAILLIE wrote: > Ok there is the

Re: [BUGS] Solution for bug #899

2003-03-13 Thread Laurent FAILLIE
Ok there is the context diff of my modification : Bye Laurent --- *** postgresql-7.3.2/src/bin/pg_dump/pg_dump.c Fri Dec 27 18:10:55 2002 --- postgresql-7.3.2/src/bin/pg_dump/pg_dump.c.new Wed Mar 5 12:12:32 2003 *** *** 601,606 --- 601,609

Re: [BUGS] Solution for bug #899

2003-03-07 Thread Laurent FAILLIE
--- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > > Can I get a context diff (diff -c) of this? Ok, but you have to wait 'till end of next week because I'm on hollidays (SSSskki :- ). > What > exactly did you > change and why? Ok, some explanations : > > 603a604,606 > > > Mov

Re: [BUGS] Solution for bug #899

2003-03-07 Thread Bruce Momjian
Can I get a context diff (diff -c) of this? What exactly did you change and why? --- Laurent FAILLIE wrote: > Hi, > > I have patched pg_dump.c to have a correct output file > when the database use procedure langages. > >

[BUGS] Solution for bug #899

2003-03-05 Thread Laurent FAILLIE
Hi, I have patched pg_dump.c to have a correct output file when the database use procedure langages. Bye Laurent PS: I have tryed to send the full source code as attachement but my message never appear in this ML, so I hope this diff file is enought ... diff 603a604,606 > Move