"Jerome O'Neil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Which makes me wonder: What is the point, if not to
> restrict updatability?
Postgres' SELECT FOR UPDATE marks rows for update, not columns.
Thus nominating columns in it would make no sense.
It was probably an unfortunate decision to use "FOR UPDAT
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Jerome O\'Neil ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 2
>
> > SELECT updatability clause defective.
>
> Nope.
>
> > The syntax for select updatability clause is non-standard.
>
> That's not a bug.
>
> > While SQL-92 BNF describes
Jerome O\'Neil ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 2
The lower the number the more severe it is.
Short Description
SELECT updatability clause defective.
Long Description
The syntax for select updatability clause is non-standard. Postgres describes select
updatability as
SELEC
