Re: [BUGS] PostgreSQL does not have native spinlock support on this

2004-06-14 Thread Bruce Momjian
Martino Serri wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > That is very strange. I assume you are on an i386 cpu. Many are running > > the same configuration just fine. > > > > Thank you for the answer. > > Yes, this is a PentiumIII 800Mhz. > > > I've searched on /src/include/storage/s_lock.h and i've

Re: [BUGS] PostgreSQL does not have native spinlock support on this

2004-06-14 Thread Martino Serri
Bruce Momjian wrote: > That is very strange. I assume you are on an i386 cpu. Many are running > the same configuration just fine. > Thank you for the answer. Yes, this is a PentiumIII 800Mhz. I've searched on /src/include/storage/s_lock.h and i've found this line. #ifdef HAVE_SPINLOCKS #error Pos

Re: [BUGS] PostgreSQL does not have native spinlock support on this

2004-06-10 Thread Bruce Momjian
That is very strange. I assume you are on an i386 cpu. Many are running the same configuration just fine. --- Martino Serri wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to compile the source code on a win2k platform but I've get > this er

[BUGS] PostgreSQL does not have native spinlock support on this platform

2004-06-10 Thread Martino Serri
Hi, I'm trying to compile the source code on a win2k platform but I've get this error: gcc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -I../../../../src/include -I./src/include/port/win32 "-I../../../../src/include/port/win32" -DBUILDING_DLL -c -o xlog.o xlog.c