Re: [BUGS] Possibly corrupted shared memory, PostgreSQL 8.1 beta2, Windows 2000

2005-10-11 Thread Jean-Pierre Pelletier
[BUGS] Possibly corrupted shared memory, PostgreSQL 8.1 beta2, Windows 2000 ""Jean-Pierre Pelletier"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote Turning off the antivirus fixed the problem. We haven't have any read/write/open error in more than two days. Thank you very much

Re: [BUGS] Possibly corrupted shared memory, PostgreSQL 8.1 beta2, Windows 2000

2005-10-07 Thread Qingqing Zhou
""Jean-Pierre Pelletier"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > Turning off the antivirus fixed the problem. > We haven't have any read/write/open error in more > than two days. > > Thank you very much for your help and keep up the good work. > You are welcome :-) But I still suspect if this really solves

Re: [BUGS] Possibly corrupted shared memory, PostgreSQL 8.1 beta2, Windows 2000

2005-10-07 Thread Jean-Pierre Pelletier
riginal Message - From: "Qingqing Zhou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 5:16 PM Subject: Re: [BUGS] Possibly corrupted shared memory, PostgreSQL 8.1 beta2, Windows 2000 ""Jean-Pierre Pelletier"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

Re: [BUGS] Possibly corrupted shared memory, PostgreSQL 8.1 beta2, Windows 2000

2005-10-07 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 11:19:25AM -0400, Jean-Pierre Pelletier wrote: > Our only remaining PostgreSQL problem is with pg_stat_actitivity > being unreliable and the statistics collector being restarted many times > every day. The stats collector (which mantains pg_stat_activity among other things

Re: [BUGS] Possibly corrupted shared memory, PostgreSQL 8.1 beta2, Windows 2000

2005-10-05 Thread Jean-Pierre Pelletier
: Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 5:16 PM Subject: Re: [BUGS] Possibly corrupted shared memory, PostgreSQL 8.1 beta2, Windows 2000 ""Jean-Pierre Pelletier"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Yes, there is an antivirus software on the m

Re: [BUGS] Possibly corrupted shared memory, PostgreSQL 8.1 beta2, Windows 2000

2005-10-05 Thread Qingqing Zhou
""Jean-Pierre Pelletier"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Yes, there is an antivirus software on the machine, a reboot is needed > when it's turned off, > I'll be allowed to reboot it tonight or I'll do it sooner if it crashes > before that. > > There are around

Re: [BUGS] Possibly corrupted shared memory, PostgreSQL 8.1 beta2, Windows 2000

2005-10-05 Thread Jean-Pierre Pelletier
inserts but no bulk inserts, the biggest load would come from select statements. Jean-Pierre Pelletier - Original Message - From: "Qingqing Zhou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 3:03 AM Subject: Re: [BUGS] Possibly corrupted shared memory,

Re: [BUGS] Possibly corrupted shared memory, PostgreSQL 8.1 beta2, Windows 2000

2005-10-04 Thread Qingqing Zhou
""Jean-Pierre Pelletier"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > > I've installed PostgreSQL 8.1 beta2 five days ago and it crashed 3 times > since then. > Here is what's been logged for the last crash > > 2005-10-04 11:00:19 FATAL: could not read block 121 of relation > 1663/16384/2608: Invalid argument

[BUGS] Possibly corrupted shared memory, PostgreSQL 8.1 beta2, Windows 2000

2005-10-04 Thread Jean-Pierre Pelletier
Hi, I've installed PostgreSQL 8.1 beta2 five days ago and it crashed 3 times since then. Here is what's been logged for the last crash 2005-10-04 11:00:19 FATAL: could not read block 121 of relation 1663/16384/2608: Invalid argument 2005-10-04 11:00:20 LOG: server process (PID 2592) was ter