Tom Lane wrote:
! maskl = (0xUL << (32 - (int)
bits))
! & 0xUL;
Is that "& 0xUL" required ?
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> So I'm guessing there is something wrong with the way 0.0.0.0/0 is being
> recognized?
Hmm, I'm betting you are on a machine where shifting a 32-bit quantity
left 32 bits doesn't reliably give zero. This misbehavior is actually
allowed by the C standard :-( ... but it
Hey guys,
I'm a fairly new user to the postgresql world... so *perhaps* this is not a
bug. But I cannot get
the following entry to work in the pg_hba.conf file:
hostall all 0.0.0.0/0 md5 <-- doesn't work
hostall all 4.0.0.0/8 md5 <-- matches anything 4.x.x.x (wor