subject:"\[BUGS\] PROC struct"

Re: [BUGS] PROC struct

2001-02-06 Thread Myron Scott

On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > Myron Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > May I suggest that watiHolder and waitLock pointers > > in the proc struct in proc.h be changed from direct > > pointers to SHMEM_OFFSET. They are both shared memory > > structures in a shared memory structure an

Re: [BUGS] PROC struct

2001-02-05 Thread Tom Lane

Myron Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > May I suggest that watiHolder and waitLock pointers > in the proc struct in proc.h be changed from direct > pointers to SHMEM_OFFSET. They are both shared memory > structures in a shared memory structure and it would > be more consistent to make these SHM

[BUGS] PROC struct

2001-02-05 Thread Myron Scott

Hi, May I suggest that watiHolder and waitLock pointers in the proc struct in proc.h be changed from direct pointers to SHMEM_OFFSET. They are both shared memory structures in a shared memory structure and it would be more consistent to make these SHMEM_OFFSET. Direct pointers will be a problem