Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> it's been some months so I left the fullquote attached.
>
> > Well, you are the first to report that 127.0.0.1 doesn't work for stats.
> > Unless someone else has a problem, I think we will leave it unchanged.
>
>
> T
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
"Bjoern A. Zeeb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
A datagram socket (SOCK_DGRAM) is called "UDP Socket" when it
assumes IP (AF_INET) or IPv6 (AF_INET6) as it's underlying
protocol.
But you can always use SOCK_DGRAM over AF_LOCAL.
I'm unconvinced that that has th
"Bjoern A. Zeeb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A datagram socket (SOCK_DGRAM) is called "UDP Socket" when it
> assumes IP (AF_INET) or IPv6 (AF_INET6) as it's underlying
> protocol.
> But you can always use SOCK_DGRAM over AF_LOCAL.
I'm unconvinced that that has the same semantics on all platforms
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
Hi,
"Bjoern A. Zeeb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Is there any reason why you explicitly disallow a posix local socket
at that point in backend/postmaster/pgstat.c:pgstat_init:
Because we want UDP, not a Unix socket.
what you are giving there as hints is
"Bjoern A. Zeeb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there any reason why you explicitly disallow a posix local socket
> at that point in backend/postmaster/pgstat.c:pgstat_init:
Because we want UDP, not a Unix socket.
regards, tom lane
---(end of bro
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Hi,
it's been some months so I left the fullquote attached.
Well, you are the first to report that 127.0.0.1 doesn't work for stats.
Unless someone else has a problem, I think we will leave it unchanged.
The last years this problem was disucced sever
Well, you are the first to report that 127.0.0.1 doesn't work for stats.
Unless someone else has a problem, I think we will leave it unchanged.
---
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> PRIO: low
>
> Hi,
>
> in src/backend/postmaster/p
PRIO: low
Hi,
in src/backend/postmaster/pgstat.c there is a hard coded bind to
127.0.0.1 that fails if 127.0.0.1 is not configured on loopback
interface (e.g. administrator explicitly removed this IP).
This should _not_ be the case in normal setups.
--- gmake check ---
...
== creati