2011/8/17 Rainer Pruy :
> Hallo,
> this is strange for sure. The database is in heavy use regularly.
> So it is - if at all - a rare occurrence.
>
> The update statement reported 346305 updated rows.
> And I could verify that this is the number of rows that hat there value
> change
> (where afterwa
Hallo,
this is strange for sure. The database is in heavy use regularly.
So it is - if at all - a rare occurrence.
The update statement reported 346305 updated rows.
And I could verify that this is the number of rows that hat there value
change
(where afterwards there was a "new" version in the ta
Hello
2011/8/17 Rainer Pruy :
> This is strange and as of now I do not have a reliable way of reproducing.
> Nevertheless,
> either there is a major blunder on my side that urgently needs being
> pointed at and eliminated
> or there is something really strange with PG.
>
> Short version:
>
> I upd
This is strange and as of now I do not have a reliable way of reproducing.
Nevertheless,
either there is a major blunder on my side that urgently needs being
pointed at and eliminated
or there is something really strange with PG.
Short version:
I update some rows of a table changing non-primary k
