On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On mån, 2010-07-19 at 13:32 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>> I'm working on setting up a new buildfarm member as we don't seem to
>> have any active Solaris ones :-(
>>
>> cc -Xa -m64 -mt -mt -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE
>> -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEM
On mån, 2010-07-19 at 13:32 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> I'm working on setting up a new buildfarm member as we don't seem to
> have any active Solaris ones :-(
>
> cc -Xa -m64 -mt -mt -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE
> -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -KPIC -DFRONTEND -DUNSAFE_STAT_OK -I.
> -I../../../src/in
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On mån, 2010-07-19 at 13:32 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>> I'm working on setting up a new buildfarm member as we don't seem to
>> have any active Solaris ones :-(
>>
>> cc -Xa -m64 -mt -mt -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE
>> -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEM
On mån, 2010-07-19 at 13:32 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> I'm working on setting up a new buildfarm member as we don't seem to
> have any active Solaris ones :-(
>
> cc -Xa -m64 -mt -mt -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE
> -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -KPIC -DFRONTEND -DUNSAFE_STAT_OK -I.
> -I../../../src/in
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Zdenek Kotala wrote:
>> OpenSSL fails, due to
>> lack of libcryto, and TCL seems to fail due to lack of headers (though
>> I didn't look very hard).
>
> You need to set RPATH. Openssl is in /usr/sfw/lib (/usr/sfw/lib/64)
>
> You need this for 32bit
> 'LDFLAGS' =>
Dave Page píše v po 19. 07. 2010 v 14:24 +0100:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> > Dave Page píše v po 19. 07. 2010 v 13:32 +0100:
> >> I'm working on setting up a new buildfarm member as we don't seem to
> >> have any active Solaris ones :-(
> >
> > Unfortunately, I had t
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> Dave Page píše v po 19. 07. 2010 v 13:32 +0100:
>> I'm working on setting up a new buildfarm member as we don't seem to
>> have any active Solaris ones :-(
>
> Unfortunately, I had to stop them :(. Sorry.
>
> I cannot remember this bug. Howev
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> That code wouldn't be getting compiled if configure hadn't found
>> getpeerucred present, so I'll bet the problem is just lack of the
>> #include file that declares the above symbols. A bit of grepping
>> of /usr/include should give y
I wrote:
> That code wouldn't be getting compiled if configure hadn't found
> getpeerucred present, so I'll bet the problem is just lack of the
> #include file that declares the above symbols. A bit of grepping
> of /usr/include should give you the answer.
... but looking in src/backend/libpq/aut
Dave Page píše v po 19. 07. 2010 v 13:32 +0100:
> I'm working on setting up a new buildfarm member as we don't seem to
> have any active Solaris ones :-(
Unfortunately, I had to stop them :(. Sorry.
I cannot remember this bug. However for Solaris 10 is better to use
SunStudio 11. I see lot of bug
Dave Page writes:
> I'm working on setting up a new buildfarm member as we don't seem to
> have any active Solaris ones :-(
> cc -Xa -m64 -mt -mt -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE
> -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -KPIC -DFRONTEND -DUNSAFE_STAT_OK -I.
> -I../../../src/include -I../../../src/port -I../../
I'm working on setting up a new buildfarm member as we don't seem to
have any active Solaris ones :-(
cc -Xa -m64 -mt -mt -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE
-D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -KPIC -DFRONTEND -DUNSAFE_STAT_OK -I.
-I../../../src/include -I../../../src/port -I../../../src/port
-DSO_MAJOR_VERSIO
12 matches
Mail list logo
