I think this had been addressed.
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 05:39:55PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > That was my guess, though his changes were s_lock related. Seems that is
> > > an Alpha mess too.
> >
> > Yes, it sounds like we will need some help f
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That was my guess, though his changes were s_lock related. Seems that is
> an Alpha mess too.
Yes, it sounds like we will need some help from a certified Alpha guru
to make spinlock code that works reliably on multi-CPU Alphas :-(.
Anyone have friends
That was my guess, though his changes were s_lock related. Seems that is
an Alpha mess too.
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I am unsure how to address this NetBSD/alpha patch.
>
> I'd say leave it out for now. After I finish the fmgr revisions we
> ought to have a better shot a
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am unsure how to address this NetBSD/alpha patch.
I'd say leave it out for now. After I finish the fmgr revisions we
ought to have a better shot at porting to Alphas. I know most of
Ryan K's Linux/Alpha patches will go away with that.
I am only fif
I am unsure how to address this NetBSD/alpha patch.
> Here are minimal patches to get 7.0 beta 3 limping along on NetBSD/alpha
> release 1.4.1.
>
> There are lots of problems with the oid handling, and I can't get it
> to successfully even begin to do a make runcheck, make runtest, or
> make b
"Kevin P. Neal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here are minimal patches to get 7.0 beta 3 limping along on NetBSD/alpha
release 1.4.1.
Has anyone compared these to Ryan Kirkpatrick's efforts for Linux/Alpha?
regards, tom lane
Yes, we can't apply this at this stage of the game. Just too many
port-specific changes.
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, Kevin P. Neal wrote:
>
> > Here are minimal patches to get 7.0 beta 3 limping along on NetBSD/alpha
> > release 1.4.1.
>
> *
