y...@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) writes:
> commit 337b6f5ecf05b21b5e997986884d097d60e4e3d0 marked comparetup_datum
> "should not be called" but actually it is called for eg. tape-based sort.
Yeah, that's pretty broken. Patch applied, thanks!
regards, tom lane
--
hi,
commit 337b6f5ecf05b21b5e997986884d097d60e4e3d0 marked comparetup_datum
"should not be called" but actually it is called for eg. tape-based sort.
a testcase:
select generate_series(1,100) a into t;
set maintenance_work_mem=1024;
create index concurrently i on t (a)
