Re: [BUGS] ECPG CONNECT TO DEFAULT segfault

2004-12-30 Thread Michael Meskes
Zitat von Michael Fuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> This is exactly what I did fix with the work mentioned in the hackers >> thread. It should work nicely with CVS HEAD. Could you please try >> this? > > Try what? I don't see a patch, link, or suggested fix in the > thread -- just your original messag

Re: [BUGS] ECPG CONNECT TO DEFAULT segfault

2004-12-29 Thread Michael Fuhr
On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 10:32:21AM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote: > On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 11:15:52PM -0700, Michael Fuhr wrote: > > > > ECPG's CONNECT TO DEFAULT causes a segmentation fault. This > > originally came up in the "Connection without database name" thread > > in pgsql-hackers: > > Th

Re: [BUGS] ECPG CONNECT TO DEFAULT segfault

2004-12-29 Thread Michael Meskes
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 11:15:52PM -0700, Michael Fuhr wrote: > PostgreSQL 8.0.0rc2, 7.4.6 > Solaris 9, FreeBSD 4.11-PRERELEASE > > ECPG's CONNECT TO DEFAULT causes a segmentation fault. This > originally came up in the "Connection without database name" thread > in pgsql-hackers: > This i

[BUGS] ECPG CONNECT TO DEFAULT segfault

2004-12-28 Thread Michael Fuhr
PostgreSQL 8.0.0rc2, 7.4.6 Solaris 9, FreeBSD 4.11-PRERELEASE ECPG's CONNECT TO DEFAULT causes a segmentation fault. This originally came up in the "Connection without database name" thread in pgsql-hackers: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-12/msg00813.php Example: #include i