Re: [BUGS] Correct Unicode sorting depends on how initdb was run

2003-08-14 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Nils Philippsen writes: >> Hmm. I ask myself whether this is desired behaviour, too. > No, but it will take a lot of work to fix this, such as implementing our > own locale library. We should, however, look into using C99-spec routines where availab

Re: [BUGS] Correct Unicode sorting depends on how initdb was run

2003-08-14 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Nils Philippsen writes: > On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 10:49, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Nils Philippsen writes: > > > > > Is this expected behaviour > > > > Yes. > > Hmm. I ask myself whether this is desired behaviour, too. No, but it will take a lot of work to fix this, such as implementing our own l

Re: [BUGS] Correct Unicode sorting depends on how initdb was run

2003-08-14 Thread Nils Philippsen
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 10:49, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Nils Philippsen writes: > > > Is this expected behaviour > > Yes. Hmm. I ask myself whether this is desired behaviour, too. Given that this isn't obviously documented (at least I didn't find it), I'd expect sort order to be dependent on ser

[BUGS] Correct Unicode sorting depends on how initdb was run

2003-08-14 Thread Nils Philippsen
Hi there, Recently I stumbled over a very strange problem: I had two very similar setups (RHL9 with latest updates, pgsql-7.3.2, parameters in "show all" the same, databases with encoding=UNICODE, loaded from the same database dump) where the sorting on one was erroneous with regards to accented c

Re: [BUGS] Correct Unicode sorting depends on how initdb was run

2003-08-11 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Nils Philippsen writes: > Is this expected behaviour Yes. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org