On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 16:25, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian writes:
>> > Tom Lane wrote:
>> >> Hmm ... considering that's the first thing in the release notes, I'm
>> >> surprised Martin missed it. Maybe he was looking for something
>> >> mentioning backslashes ... sho
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Hmm ... considering that's the first thing in the release notes, I'm
> >> surprised Martin missed it. Maybe he was looking for something
> >> mentioning backslashes ... should we add a bit that specifically says
> >> that backslashe
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hmm ... considering that's the first thing in the release notes, I'm
>> surprised Martin missed it. Maybe he was looking for something
>> mentioning backslashes ... should we add a bit that specifically says
>> that backslashes are now no-ops by default?
Tom Lane wrote:
> hubert depesz lubaczewski writes:
> > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 06:20:23PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> >> Since HISTORY does not mention this, is that an explicit decision to
> >> finally deprecate the old \' syntax (which would be great, as it makes
> >> this thing a lot more robu
hubert depesz lubaczewski [2011-05-10 18:37 +0200]:
> release notes clearly mentions is:
> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/release-9-1.html
> >> - Change the default value of standard_conforming_strings to on (Robert
> >> Haas)
> [...]
Ah, of course. Thanks!
(grep failure, sorry)
hubert depesz lubaczewski writes:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 06:20:23PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
>> Since HISTORY does not mention this, is that an explicit decision to
>> finally deprecate the old \' syntax (which would be great, as it makes
>> this thing a lot more robust and deterministic, but
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 06:20:23PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Since HISTORY does not mention this, is that an explicit decision to
> finally deprecate the old \' syntax (which would be great, as it makes
> this thing a lot more robust and deterministic, but it might be worth
> mentioning it in HIS
Hello again,
sorry for spamming you today, but I promise that this is the last
mail; it's the one remaining test case failure for me.
I have some test cases to verify the handling of the obsolete \'
escaping in different locales (cf. CVE-2006-2313).
Up to 9.0, \' was still allowed in safe locale
