Thank you:) I didn't even thought of this case. I am a bit surprised
that "::" has higher precedence than negation, but maybe it has some
cause.
Sorry for sending it to this list.
Best regards,
Otto
2008/1/21, Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ottó Havasvölgyi wrote:
> > In 8.2.5:
> >
>
Ottó Havasvölgyi wrote:
In 8.2.5:
This does not work (out of range):
select -32768::int2
But this works:
select cast(-32768 as int2);
What is the difference between the two syntax in the background? I
always thought they are the same.
"select -32768::int2" is equal to "select -(32768::int2)"
But 8.2.6 works the same. I have just upgraded.
2008/1/21, Ottó Havasvölgyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Sorry, version is 8.2.4
>
> 2008/1/21, Ottó Havasvölgyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In 8.2.5:
> >
> > This does not work (out of range):
> > select -32768::int2
> >
> > But this works:
> > s
Sorry, version is 8.2.4
2008/1/21, Ottó Havasvölgyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> In 8.2.5:
>
> This does not work (out of range):
> select -32768::int2
>
> But this works:
> select cast(-32768 as int2);
>
> What is the difference between the two syntax in the background? I
> always thought they
Hi,
In 8.2.5:
This does not work (out of range):
select -32768::int2
But this works:
select cast(-32768 as int2);
What is the difference between the two syntax in the background? I
always thought they are the same.
Best regards,
Otto
---(end of broadcast)--
