"Alon Goldshuv" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In the folllowing check (copy.c:DoCopy() ), I *think* that the check for the
> is_from flag is mistakenly negated.
Yeah, it's definitely backward :-( Will fix.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)--
In the folllowing check (copy.c:DoCopy() ), I *think* that the check for the
is_from flag is mistakenly negated. is_from means -> from file to database,
therefore we should check for , and not
. The current code allows loading and disallows
reading in read-only.
/* check read-only transaction
