Re: [BUGS] Bug in pg_dump

2002-11-16 Thread Robert John Shepherd
> >7.4 should hold the fix for > >pg_dump, although 7.3 has the dependency tracking mechanism. > > Which means that in theory we can back-patch them for 7.3.1. Not wanting to get too involved in discussions as to whether this should be done or not, I would recommend you nice chaps save your stren

Re: [BUGS] Bug in pg_dump

2002-11-15 Thread Philip Warner
At 01:51 PM 15/11/2002 -0500, Rod Taylor wrote: 7.4 should hold the fix for pg_dump, although 7.3 has the dependency tracking mechanism. Which means that in theory we can back-patch them for 7.3.1. Philip Warner

Re: [BUGS] Bug in pg_dump

2002-11-15 Thread Rod Taylor
> If you know how this problem might be fixed, list the solution below: > - > > Dump all functions and types before indexes This causes errors in other ways. The true solution is to have pg_dump use a decent dependency tracking

[BUGS] Bug in pg_dump

2002-11-15 Thread Robert John Shepherd
POSTGRESQL BUG REPORT TEMPLATE Your name : Robert John Shepherd Your email address : [

[BUGS] bug in pg_dump -- missing CREATE SEQUENCE statements

2001-12-10 Thread Brent Verner
Hey all, pg_dump fails to output necessary CREATE SEQUENCE statements unless the SERIAL column is named "id" when called with the '-t tablename' switch. When '-t' is not specified, the CREATE SEQUENCE statements do get output. wishing-I'd-noticed-this-Friday-nite-ly y'rs, brent Observerat

[BUGS] bug in pg_dump

2000-06-20 Thread Merrill Oveson
PGSQL-BUGS: I recently did a pg_dump of my data from 7.0 and did an upgrade to 7.0.2. Then I did a: psql "database name" -f "my sql dump file" The problem is that a table was created that uses a funtion, which function had not yet been created. (The function is created later on in the dump file