Re: [BUGS] Bug #880: COMMENT ON DATABASE depends on current database

2003-01-27 Thread Bruce Momjian
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > Do we have psql -l to connect to all the databases to collect comments? > > I guess we could _try_ to connect to as many databases as possible, but > > it seems a little overly complex to me. What do others think? > > I tend to think that the

Re: [BUGS] Bug #880: COMMENT ON DATABASE depends on current database

2003-01-27 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Bruce Momjian writes: > Do we have psql -l to connect to all the databases to collect comments? > I guess we could _try_ to connect to as many databases as possible, but > it seems a little overly complex to me. What do others think? I tend to think that the functionality to give comments to dat

Re: [BUGS] Bug #880: COMMENT ON DATABASE depends on current database

2003-01-26 Thread Bruce Momjian
Bhuvan A wrote: > > Long Description PostgreSQL has mechanism for commenting databases. > > Database comments can by read by obj_description(oid), psql \l+ command > > use it. Database comments should be global, but they are not, when we do > > \l+ on one database, and then on other, results will b

Re: [BUGS] Bug #880: COMMENT ON DATABASE depends on current database

2003-01-24 Thread Bhuvan A
> Long Description PostgreSQL has mechanism for commenting databases. > Database comments can by read by obj_description(oid), psql \l+ command > use it. Database comments should be global, but they are not, when we do > \l+ on one database, and then on other, results will be different. I > conside

[BUGS] Bug #880: COMMENT ON DATABASE depends on current database

2003-01-22 Thread pgsql-bugs
Marcin Kaminski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 3 The lower the number the more severe it is. Short Description COMMENT ON DATABASE depends on current database Long Description PostgreSQL has mechanism for commenting databases. Database comments can by read by obj_description