Re: [BUGS] Bug #740: Temp tables not deleted if postmaster

2002-08-17 Thread Tom Lane
Philip Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 11:10 17/08/2002 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Temp tables not deleted if postmaster crashes >> >> This is dealt with in current sources, although not in the way you propose. > Great - what does it do? Temp-table namespaces are flushed when a backend fi

Re: [BUGS] Bug #740: Temp tables not deleted if postmaster

2002-08-17 Thread Philip Warner
At 11:10 17/08/2002 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Temp tables not deleted if postmaster crashes > >This is dealt with in current sources, although not in the way you propose. Great - what does it do? > regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)---

Re: [BUGS] Bug #740: Temp tables not deleted if postmaster crashes

2002-08-17 Thread Tom Lane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Temp tables not deleted if postmaster crashes This is dealt with in current sources, although not in the way you propose. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lis

[BUGS] Bug #740: Temp tables not deleted if postmaster crashes

2002-08-17 Thread pgsql-bugs
Philip Warner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 2 The lower the number the more severe it is. Short Description Temp tables not deleted if postmaster crashes Long Description If a postmaster crashes then any temporary tables associated with the backend will not be deleted, wh