Re: [BUGS] Bug #441: Index using INT8 data type is ignored

2001-09-07 Thread grant
2 questions: 1) Have you recently run an analyze? 2) Are you sure that an index scan would be more efficient than a seq scan? (are less than 25% of the records selected) I don't know the break-off boint in the query optimizer, but it may be more efficient on that table to read the whole thing.

Re: [BUGS] Bug #441: Index using INT8 data type is ignored

2001-09-07 Thread Tom Lane
Try coercing your constants to int8 explicitly: ... WHERE int8col = 42::int8; See the archives for more info about this. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the

[BUGS] Bug #441: Index using INT8 data type is ignored

2001-09-07 Thread pgsql-bugs
Mauro Flores ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 3 The lower the number the more severe it is. Short Description Index using INT8 data type is ignored Long Description I have some tables on my data base with index and primary keys over int8(bigint) data type columns. Postgress