"John Kennedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Was incommunicado for a while...but just to close, FYI I have verified the
> bug is fixed in both Beta 5 and RC1.
> Another bug I spotted in Beta4 (variables in functions having their values
> changing for no apparent reason) has also been fixed in be
: Re: [BUGS] Beta4 postgres.exe crash "...terminated by signal 5"
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 17:01:17 -0500
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> "John Kennedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> I am very new to PostgreSQL so apologies i
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> "John Kennedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> I am very new to PostgreSQL so apologies in advance if this bug report is a
>>> waste of time for some reason.
>>
>> Not at all. Looks like you've found a mistake in where variables of
>
Tom Lane wrote:
> "John Kennedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I am very new to PostgreSQL so apologies in advance if this bug report is a
> > waste of time for some reason.
>
> Not at all. Looks like you've found a mistake in where variables of
> pass-by-reference datatypes get stored. Thank
"John Kennedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am very new to PostgreSQL so apologies in advance if this bug report is a
> waste of time for some reason.
Not at all. Looks like you've found a mistake in where variables of
pass-by-reference datatypes get stored. Thanks for the report!
Greetings.
I am very new to PostgreSQL so apologies in advance if this bug report is a
waste of time for some reason.
Summary:
I have been experimenting with 8.0 Beta4 on Windows XP and the attached SQL
resulted in a crash of the database (not the postmaster as far as I can
tell). My code creat
