Thanks for your helpful explanations. Reading subsection 13.2.1 makes
sense now. I am not sure if and how the documentation could be improved,
but I propose below some suggestions that you may find relevant. My
confusion may have stem from my lack of knowledge in PostgreSQL locking
mechanism.
louis-claude.ca...@univ-fcomte.fr wrote:
> In the first paragraph of Section 13.2.1, it is first stated that
> "[with] this isolation level, a SELECT query [...] never sees [...]
> changes committed during query execution by concurrent
> transactions." It is my understanding that this is untrue (a
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 7623
Logged by: Louis-Claude Canon
Email address: louis-claude.ca...@univ-fcomte.fr
PostgreSQL version: 9.2.1
Operating system: All
Description:
In the first paragraph of Section 13.2.1, it is first stat
