Re: [BUGS] BUG #6705: 32 bit

2012-07-02 Thread Sachin Srivastava
I looked at the logs you sent. Strangely the command *"D:\Program Files\PostgreSQL\9.1\bin\initdb.exe" --locale=C --encoding=UTF-8 -A md5 -U postgres -d "D:\Program Files\PostgreSQL\9.1\data"* * * produces no output in the log. Can you try to manually execute this above command and share the outpu

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6705: 32 bit

2012-06-27 Thread Dave Page
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Craig Ringer wrote: > On 06/26/2012 06:26 PM, Dave Page wrote: >> >> Any ideas for a one-liner to add? I'm struggling to find nice wording, >> that doesn't invite people to report issues without investigating >> themselves first: >> >> * If you need help, please re

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6705: 32 bit

2012-06-27 Thread Dave Page
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Craig Ringer wrote: > On 06/27/2012 02:49 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > >> There are some easy api to get whether the box is on a domain or not, and >> it's easily accessible from wsh as well. And it ought to be trivial in power >> shell... >> > Good to know. Since

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6705: 32 bit

2012-06-27 Thread Craig Ringer
On 06/27/2012 02:49 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: There are some easy api to get whether the box is on a domain or not, and it's easily accessible from wsh as well. And it ought to be trivial in power shell... Good to know. Since it's a troubleshooting tool there's no real problem with saying "

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6705: 32 bit

2012-06-26 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Jun 27, 2012 8:42 AM, "Craig Ringer" wrote: > > On 06/27/2012 02:33 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> >> >> > ... where that provides the common-issues list, a pointer to look at the installation log, then a report template for cases where it wasn't one of the common quick-fixes. >> > >> > I'm happ

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6705: 32 bit

2012-06-26 Thread Craig Ringer
On 06/27/2012 02:33 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > ... where that provides the common-issues list, a pointer to look at the installation log, then a report template for cases where it wasn't one of the common quick-fixes. > > I'm happy to work on the docs side, possibly even do a quick JavaScr

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6705: 32 bit

2012-06-26 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Jun 27, 2012 8:26 AM, "Craig Ringer" wrote: > > On 06/26/2012 06:26 PM, Dave Page wrote: >> >> Any ideas for a one-liner to add? I'm struggling to find nice wording, >> that doesn't invite people to report issues without investigating >> themselves first: >> >> * If you need help, please review

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6705: 32 bit

2012-06-26 Thread Craig Ringer
On 06/26/2012 06:26 PM, Dave Page wrote: Any ideas for a one-liner to add? I'm struggling to find nice wording, that doesn't invite people to report issues without investigating themselves first: * If you need help, please review http://xx before seeking further assistance. The positive wo

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6705: 32 bit

2012-06-26 Thread Sachin Srivastava
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 2:01 AM, Jimmy Creeks wrote: > Hi, > > As I am having the installation problem and have tried installed > postgresql tens of times, I am still in need of your help. Could you tell > me under what folder generated by the installer I can find the installation > log? Thanks.

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6705: 32 bit

2012-06-26 Thread Jimmy Creeks
Hi, As I am having the installation problem and have tried installed postgresql tens of times, I am still in need of your help. Could you tell me under what folder generated by the installer I can find the installation log? Thanks. Best, Jimmy 2012/6/25 Craig Ringer > On 06/25/2012 04:19 AM,

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6705: 32 bit

2012-06-26 Thread Dave Page
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Craig Ringer wrote: > On 06/25/2012 11:10 PM, Dave Page wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Craig Ringer wrote: > > Dave: Is there any chance the installers link to that page from their error > dialogs, or a static-and-sanitised version of it in docs? If y

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6705: 32 bit

2012-06-25 Thread Craig Ringer
On 06/25/2012 11:10 PM, Dave Page wrote: On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Craig Ringer wrote: Dave: Is there any chance the installers link to that page from their error dialogs, or a static-and-sanitised version of it in docs? If you're ok updating the installer messages I'll collect up a sani

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6705: 32 bit

2012-06-25 Thread Dave Page
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Craig Ringer wrote: > > Dave: Is there any chance the installers link to that page from their error > dialogs, or a static-and-sanitised version of it in docs? If you're ok > updating the installer messages I'll collect up a sanitized version that > doesn't link to

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6705: 32 bit

2012-06-24 Thread Craig Ringer
On 06/25/2012 04:19 AM, gj19861...@gmail.com wrote: The following bug has been logged on the website: Bug reference: 6705 Logged by: Jimmy Creeks Email address: gj19861...@gmail.com PostgreSQL version: 9.1.4 Operating system: Windows 7 Description: Hi, I cannot install 8.3

[BUGS] BUG #6705: 32 bit

2012-06-24 Thread gj19861103
The following bug has been logged on the website: Bug reference: 6705 Logged by: Jimmy Creeks Email address: gj19861...@gmail.com PostgreSQL version: 9.1.4 Operating system: Windows 7 Description: Hi, I cannot install 8.3, 9.0, or 9.1 version of postgreSQL. I also tr