> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Steve Caligo
> wrote:
>> 2) FIRST TRY, USING "UPDATE WHERE ID = ( SELECT )"
>> The goal is to have two clients set their unique ID to a
>> single/different
>> row from the table. First, using "limit" in a slightly different way:
> This is pretty clearly NOT the
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:40 AM, Steve Caligo wrote:
> Allowing FOR UPDATE in sub-queries has been rejected in this same thread,
> you've also mentioned it your previous reply.
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2004-10/msg00150.php
Um, I didn't write that email. That was Tom Lane.
>> T
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Steve Caligo wrote:
>
> The following bug has been logged online:
>
> Bug reference: 4925
> Logged by: Steve Caligo
> Email address: steve.cal...@ctie.etat.lu
> PostgreSQL version: 8.3.7 and 8.4.0
> Operating system: Archlinux and Gentoo 8.3.7,
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 4925
Logged by: Steve Caligo
Email address: steve.cal...@ctie.etat.lu
PostgreSQL version: 8.3.7 and 8.4.0
Operating system: Archlinux and Gentoo 8.3.7, Gentoo 8.4.0
Description:"select ... for update" doesn't af
