Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Peter Eisentraut" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Well, the problem is mainly that there is no query, because the bytes
>> arriving
>> are garbage. A human observer could make sense of it in some cases, but not
>> a computer in the general case.
> Ho
"Peter Eisentraut" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thomas H. wrote:
>> maybe its by design (to not insert badly encoded characters into the
>> utf8 encoded logs)? nevertheless to debug those faulty programm/codes,
>> it would help to see what query provokes the error...
>
> Well, the problem is main
Thomas H. wrote:
> maybe its by design (to not insert badly encoded characters into the
> utf8 encoded logs)? nevertheless to debug those faulty programm/codes,
> it would help to see what query provokes the error...
Well, the problem is mainly that there is no query, because the bytes arriving
a
thomas wrote:
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 4281
Logged by: thomas
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.3.3
Operating system: Windows 2003
Description:some types of errors do not log statements
Details:
this isn't reall
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> thomas wrote:
>> 2008-07-05 02:16:15 CEST 6644 486ebab4.19f4 127.0.0.1(1616)ERROR: invalid
>> byte sequence for encoding "UTF8": 0xc474
> I am unclear what would cause this.
An encoding violation in an incoming SQL command would cause it, because
we wo
thomas wrote:
>
> The following bug has been logged online:
>
> Bug reference: 4281
> Logged by: thomas
> Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> PostgreSQL version: 8.3.3
> Operating system: Windows 2003
> Description:some types of errors do not log statements
> Details:
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 4281
Logged by: thomas
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.3.3
Operating system: Windows 2003
Description:some types of errors do not log statements
Details:
this isn't really a bug but rath
