Re: [BUGS] BUG #3877: Doc Clarification: archive_command and restore_command replacements

2008-01-15 Thread Tom Lane
Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> That sounds reasonable. > Yep, I'll scan the docs and submit a patch, unless Tom has already. I have not --- go for it. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: explain an

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3877: Doc Clarification: archive_command and restore_command replacements

2008-01-15 Thread Simon Riggs
On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 14:50 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > "Kevin Hunt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The description of %p is misleading since it is replaced with not just the > > path, but also filename. > > Hm? "Path name" includes the file name in all usages I know about. Agreed. > > An example

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3877: Doc Clarification: archive_command and restore_command replacements

2008-01-15 Thread Tom Lane
"Kevin Hunt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The description of %p is misleading since it is replaced with not just the > path, but also filename. Hm? "Path name" includes the file name in all usages I know about. > An example showing how the sample commands would be expanded would also > help: T

[BUGS] BUG #3877: Doc Clarification: archive_command and restore_command replacements

2008-01-15 Thread Kevin Hunt
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 3877 Logged by: Kevin Hunt Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PostgreSQL version: 8.2.6 Operating system: n/a Description:Doc Clarification: archive_command and restore_command replacements Details: When describ