On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 10:10 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > If there are no objections, I will add an extra condition to the wait,
>
> That's not the correct fix. The problem is that the archiver is getting
> killed in the first place. What the postmaster sho
Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If there are no objections, I will add an extra condition to the wait,
That's not the correct fix. The problem is that the archiver is getting
killed in the first place. What the postmaster should do instead is
waken it after the shutdown process termina
On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 09:41 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The following bug has been logged online:
>
> Bug reference: 3843
> Logged by:
> Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> PostgreSQL version: 8.3beta4
> Operating system: RHEL5
> Description:archiver process is r
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 3843
Logged by:
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.3beta4
Operating system: RHEL5
Description:archiver process is restarted after the smart shutdown
Details:
Is this a bug though archiver
