Tom Lane-2 wrote:
>
> "Lee Packham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Dtrace is in Leopard. Just so you know :)
>
> Hmph ... that might be enough of a reason to upgrade right there ...
>
>
I believe ZFS is also in Leopard. Even more reason to upgrade!
-Robert
--
View this message in context:
"Lee Packham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dtrace is in Leopard. Just so you know :)
Hmph ... that might be enough of a reason to upgrade right there ...
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is
The only thing I couldn't do was sort out the makefile to auto
generate the header file. So the patch has a pre-built header file.
I don't know Make well, enough. Sorry.
But yeah - I was pretty annoyed they broke the -G parameter (i.e.
didn't include it at all.
Cheers,
Lee.
On 10/26/07, Robert
From: Lee Packham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I have built a patch to enable a working DTrace on OSX with Postgres 8.2.5.
> Basically the problem is that the dtrace command on OSX doesn't have
> the -G
> parameter - so you have to use the newer -h method to produce a header
> file.
>
It bothers me t
"Lee Packham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have built a patch to enable a working DTrace on OSX with Postgres 8.2.5.
You can't seriously expect us to accept a patch that rips out Solaris
dtrace support to put in OSX dtrace support :-(. Can't you fix it so
that it still uses the PG_TRACEn macro
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 3699
Logged by: Lee Packham
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.2.5
Operating system: OSX Leopard
Description:Fails to compile DTrace Support
Details:
I have built a patch to enable a workin
