Hello
2010/5/16 Ben Hockey :
> i apologize for bringing this up from over 2 years ago but i haven't been
> able to find how this issue was resolved.
it isn't bug, but request for new feature.
look on http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Developer_FAQ
I have nothing against some new datestyles - xml,
i apologize for bringing this up from over 2 years ago but i haven't
been able to find how this issue was resolved.
the following is from the ecmascript 5 specification at http://www.ecmascript.org/docs/tc39-2009-043.pdf
page 168:
15.9.1.15 Date Time String Format
ECMAScript defines a stri
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Russell Smith wrote:
The issue is output, not input.
SET datestyle='dmy';
SELECT '03-03-2004'::date
Will return '2007-03-03', not 03-03-2004 as is the set datestyle.
You are aware that DateStyle controls both input and output,
_separately_, yes?
No, I've RTFM'd to
Randolf Richardson wrote:
> After convincing clients and colleagues to switch from Oracle (and
> others) to PostgreSQL, an issue that comes up is the need to
> customize DATESTYLE. Because this isn't possible,
Sure it's possible. You replace the respective data type output
functions with somethi
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yea, it isn't too hard to do, especially for output; input might be
> harder. This is the first request we have ever gotten for this so it is
> doubtful we would add this feature unless there is more demand.
I don't think any input-side changes are bei
On Aug 22, 2007, at 10:13 , Randolf Richardson wrote:
The datestyle I need is "-Mon-DD" so that reports can easily be
generated that show dates like 2007-Aug-22. For people reading the
output, there will be absolutely no confusion about what the date is.
Are you generating report
> Randolf Richardson wrote:
>
> > After convincing clients and colleagues to switch from Oracle (and others)
> > to PostgreSQL, an issue that comes up is the need to customize DATESTYLE.
> > Because this isn't possible, the developers who were against the move to
> > PostgreSQL make it political
Randolf Richardson wrote:
> After convincing clients and colleagues to switch from Oracle (and others)
> to PostgreSQL, an issue that comes up is the need to customize DATESTYLE.
> Because this isn't possible, the developers who were against the move to
> PostgreSQL make it political and recommend
Randolf Richardson wrote:
>>> I'm hoping that this suggestion will be an easy one to implement.
>> Probably wouldn't be too hard.
>
> That's great! I'm guessing that this is due to the work already
> done with the to_char() function.
Just to be clear, I don't have any plans to actually do
Russell Smith wrote:
> The issue is output, not input.
>
> SET datestyle='dmy';
> SELECT '03-03-2004'::date
>
> Will return '2007-03-03', not 03-03-2004 as is the set datestyle.
You are aware that DateStyle controls both input and output,
_separately_, yes?
--
Alvaro Herrera
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Randolf Richardson wrote:
After convincing clients and colleagues to switch from Oracle (and others)
to PostgreSQL, an issue that comes up is the need to customize DATESTYLE.
Because this isn't possible, the developers who were against the move to
PostgreSQL make
Randolf Richardson wrote:
> After convincing clients and colleagues to switch from Oracle (and others)
> to PostgreSQL, an issue that comes up is the need to customize DATESTYLE.
> Because this isn't possible, the developers who were against the move to
> PostgreSQL make it political and recommen
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 3563
Logged by: Randolf Richardson
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.2.4
Operating system: NetBSD 4 (beta), NetBSD 3.1, NetWare 6.5
Description:DATESTYLE feature suggestion
Details:
After
13 matches
Mail list logo
