Re: [PATCHES] [BUGS] BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ

2007-02-27 Thread Bruce Momjian
Zdenek Kotala wrote: > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Zdenek Kotala wrote: > >> There is Solaris FAQ update. Please, look on it and let me know any > >> comments. > > > > The actual answer to the question "Can I compile PostgreSQL with > > Kerberos v5 support?" is "Yes, why not?". I don't think "Ca

Re: [PATCHES] [BUGS] BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ

2007-02-27 Thread Zdenek Kotala
Peter Eisentraut wrote: Zdenek Kotala wrote: There is Solaris FAQ update. Please, look on it and let me know any comments. The actual answer to the question "Can I compile PostgreSQL with Kerberos v5 support?" is "Yes, why not?". I don't think "Can I use this weird internal private library

Re: [BUGS] BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ

2007-02-26 Thread Bruce Momjian
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Zdenek Kotala wrote: > > There is Solaris FAQ update. Please, look on it and let me know any > > comments. > > The actual answer to the question "Can I compile PostgreSQL with > Kerberos v5 support?" is "Yes, why not?". I don't think "Can I use > this weird internal pr

Re: [BUGS] BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ

2007-02-25 Thread Rich Teer
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007, Zdenek Kotala wrote: There is Solaris FAQ update. Please, look on it and let me know any comments. Very minor grammatical nits aside, it looks fine to me. Thanks for updating the FAQ! Cheers, -- Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OpenSolaris CAB member President, Rite Onlin

Re: [BUGS] BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ

2007-02-23 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Zdenek Kotala wrote: > There is Solaris FAQ update. Please, look on it and let me know any > comments. The actual answer to the question "Can I compile PostgreSQL with Kerberos v5 support?" is "Yes, why not?". I don't think "Can I use this weird internal private library that seems to provide a

Re: [BUGS] BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ

2007-02-23 Thread Bruce Momjian
Patch applied. Thanks. --- Zdenek Kotala wrote: > > > There is Solaris FAQ update. Please, look on it and let me know any > comments. > > Thanks Zdenek > > > Rich Teer wrote: > > The following bug has been logg

Re: [BUGS] BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ

2007-02-23 Thread Zdenek Kotala
There is Solaris FAQ update. Please, look on it and let me know any comments. Thanks Zdenek Rich Teer wrote: The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 2969 Logged by: Rich Teer Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PostgreSQL version: 8.2.2 Operating s

Re: [BUGS] BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ

2007-02-21 Thread Zdenek Kotala
I work on it. It will be ready until Friday. Zdenek Bruce Momjian wrote: I have not seen an updated patch for FAQ_Solaris yet. --- Zdenek Kotala wrote: Rich Teer wrote: The following bug has been logged

Re: [BUGS] BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ

2007-02-19 Thread Bruce Momjian
I have not seen an updated patch for FAQ_Solaris yet. --- Zdenek Kotala wrote: > Rich Teer wrote: > > The following bug has been logged online: > > > > Bug reference: 2969 > > Logged by: Rich Teer > > Email ad

Re: [BUGS] BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ

2007-02-12 Thread Zdenek Kotala
Rich Teer wrote: The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 2969 Logged by: Rich Teer Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PostgreSQL version: 8.2.2 Operating system: Solaris 10 Description:Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ Details: Hi there, First, many than

[BUGS] BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ

2007-02-05 Thread Rich Teer
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 2969 Logged by: Rich Teer Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PostgreSQL version: 8.2.2 Operating system: Solaris 10 Description:Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ Details: Hi there, First, many thanks for providing th