"Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 18:55 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> One thought that comes to mind is to require hash to do an smgrextend()
>> addressing the last block it intends to use whenever it allocates a new
>> batch of blocks, whereupon md.c could adopt a saner
On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 18:55 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> [ cc'ing to pgsql-performance because of performance issue for hash indexes ]
>
> "Balazs Nagy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Database table size: ~60 million rows
> > Field to index: varchar 127
>
> > CREATE INDEX ... USING hash ...
I'd be
[ cc'ing to pgsql-performance because of performance issue for hash indexes ]
"Balazs Nagy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Database table size: ~60 million rows
> Field to index: varchar 127
> CREATE INDEX ... USING hash ...
> fails with a file not found error (psql in verbose mode):
> ERROR: 5
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 2737
Logged by: Balazs Nagy
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.1.5
Operating system: RHEL4
Description:hash indexing large table fails, while btree of same
index works
Details:
Postgres: 8.