On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Adriaan van Os wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Adriaan van Os <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> The manual is simply taking an old prejudice as a fact.
> >
> > No, it is stating a fact as as fact. The existence of one
> > counterexample does not disprove the generalization.
>
>
Tom Lane wrote:
Adriaan van Os <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The manual is simply taking an old prejudice as a fact.
No, it is stating a fact as as fact. The existence of one
counterexample does not disprove the generalization.
Keep dreaming. Ignorance rules the world.
Adriaan van Os
Adriaan van Os <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The manual is simply taking an old prejudice as a fact.
No, it is stating a fact as as fact. The existence of one
counterexample does not disprove the generalization.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadc
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Adriaan van Os <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Section 32.9.5. Writing Code of the 8.1 docs says:
While it may be possible to load functions written in languages
other than
C into PostgreSQL, this is usually difficult (when it is possible at
all)
because other languages,
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 13:08:17 +,
Adriaan van Os <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Section 32.9.5. Writing Code of the 8.1 docs says:
>
> >>While it may be possible to load functions written in languages other than
> C into PostgreSQL, this is usually difficult (when it is possible at all)
>
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 2292
Logged by: Adriaan van Os
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.1
Operating system: Mac OS X
Description:Calling conventions in docs
Details:
Section 32.9.5. Writing Code of the 8.1 docs
