Re: [BUGS] BUG #1741: %i missing in snprintf implementation

2005-07-01 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > "Tim Mauch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The implementation of snprintf/vsnprintf in src/port/snprintf.c does not > > allow the use of %i ( %d equivalent ). This likely isn't a problem for > > postgres itself, but when a program compiles with -lpq and the standard c > > librar

Re: [BUGS] BUG #1741: %i missing in snprintf implementation

2005-06-30 Thread Tom Lane
"Tim Mauch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The implementation of snprintf/vsnprintf in src/port/snprintf.c does not > allow the use of %i ( %d equivalent ). This likely isn't a problem for > postgres itself, but when a program compiles with -lpq and the standard c > libraries are not previously inc

[BUGS] BUG #1741: %i missing in snprintf implementation

2005-06-30 Thread Tim Mauch
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 1741 Logged by: Tim Mauch Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PostgreSQL version: 8.0.1 - 8.0.3 Operating system: Redhat linux 8.0 Description:%i missing in snprintf implementation Details: The implementation of