On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 01:58:13AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Time zone component should be added, not subtracted.
> Why?
Here's three different ways of looking at the question and
seeing that what Postgres is currently doing must be wrong.
Correcting the way time zone component is applied fixe
"Dennis Vshivkov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Time zone component should be added, not subtracted.
Done.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.post
Dennis Vshivkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 01:58:13AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Time zone component should be added, not subtracted.
>>> Why?
> [ good arguments snipped ]
OK, I'm convinced --- particularly by the point that no place else in
the backend thinks "timetz-
"Dennis Vshivkov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Time zone component should be added, not subtracted.
Why?
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postg
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 1618
Logged by: Dennis Vshivkov
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 7.4.6, 8.0.1
Operating system: Debian GNU/Linux, kernel 2.4
Description:EXTRACTing EPOCH from TIME WITH TIME ZONE is broken
De
