Re: [BUGS] 9.1beta1 "collate" test failure

2011-05-10 Thread Tom Lane
Martin Pitt writes: > Tom Lane [2011-05-10 10:03 -0400]: >> [ raised eyebrow... ] What platform? This seems to point towards "C" >> locale not doing what it is supposed to ... > After your comment I checked locales on my system, and for some reason > I had an /usr/lib/locales/C.UTF-8/ besides t

Re: [BUGS] 9.1beta1 "collate" test failure

2011-05-10 Thread Martin Pitt
Tom Lane [2011-05-10 10:03 -0400]: > [ raised eyebrow... ] What platform? This seems to point towards "C" > locale not doing what it is supposed to ... After your comment I checked locales on my system, and for some reason I had an /usr/lib/locales/C.UTF-8/ besides the usual locale-archive. I cl

Re: [BUGS] 9.1beta1 "collate" test failure

2011-05-10 Thread Tom Lane
Martin Pitt writes: > while packaging 9.1 beta1, I noticed that the "collate" test case now > fails (see attached regression.diffs). It seems to work when I run > this under LANG= LANGUAGE= (i. e. in C locale), but it fails under > both en_US.UTF-8 and de_DE.UTF-8. [ raised eyebrow... ] What pla

[BUGS] 9.1beta1 "collate" test failure

2011-05-10 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello all, while packaging 9.1 beta1, I noticed that the "collate" test case now fails (see attached regression.diffs). It seems to work when I run this under LANG= LANGUAGE= (i. e. in C locale), but it fails under both en_US.UTF-8 and de_DE.UTF-8. Is this just a bug/quirk/expectation of the test