Re: [BUGS] 7.1.3 ecpg answered BUT...

2003-12-19 Thread Michael Meskes
May I aks you why you sent he same topic with different emails to -bugs and to -general without even giving us a chance to answer? It has not been a cross-post, so I fail to see the reasoning. Anyway .. On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 09:58:05AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In more research in this p

Re: [BUGS] 7.1.3 ecpg answered BUT...

2003-12-19 Thread Peter Eisentraut
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > In more research in this problem I found that if the > EXEC SQL OPEN cursor; command was not present that > ecpg would just comment out the cusrsor declare statements. Please use a recent version and give us a reproduceable example if you expect any kind of feedback.

[BUGS] 7.1.3 ecpg answered BUT...

2003-12-19 Thread Lynn . Tilby
In more research in this problem I found that if the EXEC SQL OPEN cursor; command was not present that ecpg would just comment out the cusrsor declare statements. Might I make a suggestion that the software designers make a rule to give some kind of notice at compile time (rather than only an er