I haven't looked in great detail into why this is happpening, but it
seems as though processNamePattern() doesn't handle ?'s correctly in
the negative lookahead context correctly.
Negative lookahead context!? You are several sigmas beyond the subset
of regex functionality that \d and friends are i
Sean Chittenden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I haven't looked in great detail into why this is happpening, but it
> seems as though processNamePattern() doesn't handle ?'s correctly in
> the negative lookahead context correctly.
Negative lookahead context!? You are several sigmas beyond the su
I haven't looked in great detail into why this is happpening, but it
seems as though processNamePattern() doesn't handle ?'s correctly in
the negative lookahead context correctly.
1) \dn [pattern] strips ?'s and replaces them with periods. This may
be intentional (as the comment in describe.c
