Re: [BUGS] BUG #6204: Using plperl functions generate crash

2011-09-15 Thread pasman pasmański
Problem solved: I reinstall postgres from sources, works. pasman -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6196: Install Error

2011-09-04 Thread pasman pasmański
This is not a bug. Try to ask on pgsql-general. 2011/9/2, Maggie Brooks : > > The following bug has been logged online: > > Bug reference: 6196 > Logged by: Maggie Brooks > Email address: maggie.bro...@claraview.com > PostgreSQL version: 9.0.4 > Operating system: Windows XP >

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6160: Sources from git repository not compile.

2011-08-12 Thread pasman pasmański
Workaround is: git config core.crlf=false -- pasman -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6141: PG Admin's SQL editor can't handle large files

2011-08-02 Thread pasman pasmański
Hi. This is not postgresql bug. Try pgadmin-support list. Btw psql < script is too complicated? 2011/8/2, michael : > > The following bug has been logged online: > > Bug reference: 6141 > Logged by: michael > Email address: mpa...@yahoo.com > PostgreSQL version: 9.0 > Operating

Re: [BUGS] Problems with adding a is not null to a query.

2011-01-15 Thread pasman pasmański
Both queries use the same row's estimation and cost is comparable. But execution time differs huge: 0.044s and 3100s. I think that the cost of backward index scan is too small. On 1/15/11, Tom Lane wrote: > Tim Uckun writes: >> I reported this in the pgsql-general list and was instructed to send